Coach by ATX vs Arccos: Which Tells You What to Work On?
TL;DRSame goal. Very different approaches to the data → decision → practice loop.
Arccos and Coach by ATX are aimed at the same player: a serious amateur who wants real data, not vibes. Where they differ is how they collect the data and what they do with it afterward.
Head-to-head
| Feature | Arccos | Coach by ATX |
|---|---|---|
| Capture method | Grip-end sensors + GPS | Voice + GPS |
| Hardware required | 14 sensors | iPhone only |
| Strokes-gained data | Yes | Yes |
| Conversational coach | No | Yes (voice) |
| Weekly action item | No | Yes |
| Course database | 40,000+ | 40,000+ |
| Works offline | Partial | Full |
| Starts at | ~$100/yr + sensors | $14.99/mo (14-day trial, no card) |
Source:Public feature pages and pricing from each app at time of writing.
Who each fits
Choose Arccos if you already own the sensors, prefer zero in-round input, and you're comfortable building your own practice plan from the dashboard.
Choose Coach by ATX if you want the data and a coach that tells you which one thing to work on next. The voice-logging takes 10 seconds per hole and works even without a cell signal.
Switching from Arccos
- Your Arccos sensors keep working — nothing to throw out.
- Most users run both for two weeks to compare the data; the numbers line up within a few tenths of a stroke.
- The differentiator is the coaching layer, not the raw stats.
FAQ
Is Coach by ATX a replacement for Arccos?+
For most golfers, yes. Both deliver strokes-gained data; Coach by ATX adds a conversational coach that turns the data into a weekly action item, which is the part most Arccos users skip.
Does Coach by ATX require sensors like Arccos?+
No. Coach by ATX uses voice logging during the round — about 10 seconds per hole — instead of grip-end sensors. No hardware to buy, no batteries to charge.
Stop guessing what to work on.
Coach by ATX is launching soon. Join the waitlist and we'll email you the moment it's live.
We'll email you at launch.